<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Digitization Projects at UNLV Libraries</title>
      <link>http://blogs.library.unlv.edu/digital/</link>
      <description>Digitization news, information-sharing, and commentary for the UNLV community and beyond.</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 15:07:05 -0800</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

            <item>
         <title>Grant-funded Digitization Employment Opportunities at UNLV</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Recently, The University Libraries were awarded an LSTA grant to fund a new digitization project: <em>Southern Nevada: The Boomtown Years 1900-1925</em>. This project will focus on digitization of materials in our historic mining and railroad collections and will involve collaboration with local partners to identify content and make it more accessible through an online collection. 

The Libraries are currently seeking candidates for the following two temporary grant-funded positions: a Digital Collections Metadata Specialist and an intern currently enrolled in the University of North Texas School of Library and Information Sciences program. More detailed information and required qualifications can be found on the <a href="http://www.library.unlv.edu/employment/fac_pro_staff.html">Libraries' employment page</a>.

This is a great opportunity to get involved in the full digitization life-cycle and work with a great team of people at the Libraries.  <a href="mailto:cory.lampert@unlv.edu">Contact</a> me for more information. ]]></description>
         <link>http://blogs.library.unlv.edu/digital/2008/05/grantfunded_digitization_emplo.html</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.library.unlv.edu/digital/2008/05/grantfunded_digitization_emplo.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Announcements</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 15:07:05 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Spending a Little Quality Time with Metadata</title>
         <description><![CDATA[This week marks the start of an online course my employer was kind enough to pay for me to attend called "<a href="http://images.library.uiuc.edu/projects/mym/"><a href="http://images.library.uiuc.edu/projects/mym/">Metadata for You and Me: A Training Program for Shareable Metadata</a></a>".

I was interested in taking this course for two main reasons: first, because in the world of digitization we spend a huge amount of time creating metadata on the item level for every digital object in out repositories and this equates to lots of dollars in staff time. So, I'd like to spend some time thinking about this investment and what type of returns it is providing for us.  Are we agonizing over the right things? Spending too much time or detail?  Using appropriate standards?

Secondly, we do indeed have the noble goal of providing accurate, easily discoverable, re-useable records but are we delivering the goods or deluding ourselves? What exactly does our metadata look like outside our own local repository and does it mind its manners?  As much as I'd like to say that my metadata is a model citizen...I just don't really know.  With more and more materials being aggregated with the goal of broader access, it's time to try and find out.

I logged into the on-line course this morning and printed out some of the readings for the first module.  I couldn't help but draw attention to a fabulous article, <em><a href="http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue12_3/elings/">Metadata For All: Descriptive Standards across Libraries, Archives, and Museums</a></em> that worked miracles in helping me to understand what exactly we are talking about when we discuss metadata (especially across library, museum, and archives standards). It is also recent enough (2007) to provide up-to date information about recent trends and proposes a format-based way of looking at standards in the parallel disciplines. A very good read.

I will update this blog as I progress through the course and learn more!]]></description>
         <link>http://blogs.library.unlv.edu/digital/2008/05/spending_a_little_quality_time_1.html</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.library.unlv.edu/digital/2008/05/spending_a_little_quality_time_1.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">metadata</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 14:59:18 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>UNLV Announces New Digital Collection: The Nevada Test Site Oral History Project</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<img alt="NTSOHP_main.jpg" src="http://blogs.library.unlv.edu/digital/NTSOHP_main.jpg" width="240" height="305" />

The <a href="http://www.library.unlv.edu/">University Libraries</a> are pleased to announce the launch of a new digital collection:
 
<a href="http://digital.library.unlv.edu/ntsohp/">The Nevada Test Site Oral History Project</a>
http://digital.library.unlv.edu/ntsohp/

The Nevada Test Site Oral History Project  documents the remembered past of persons affiliated with and affected by the Nevada Test Site during the era of Cold War nuclear testing. Through the Libraries' partnership with the UNLV College of Liberal Arts, a wide range of oral history interviews were organized to be presented in an digital collection representing diverse points of view including: scientists and engineers; labor and support personnel; military personnel and corporate executives; Native American leaders; peace activists and protesters; Nevada ranchers and communities downwind of the test site. The Nevada Test Site Oral History Project was directed by Mary Palevsky from September 2003 through July 2007 with funding from U.S. Depts. of Energy and Education. For the academic year 2007-2008 work on final interviews, the digital collection, and project website was supported by the University Libraries and the Department of History. 

Nearly 200 full-text searchable transcripts and audio clips are now available in this digital collection.  For more information about the collection, or to share your comments, please feel free to contact me via e-mail at cory.lampert@unlv.edu.
]]></description>
         <link>http://blogs.library.unlv.edu/digital/2008/04/_the_university_libraries_are.html</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.library.unlv.edu/digital/2008/04/_the_university_libraries_are.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 11:36:08 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>New Report on JPEG2000 Image Format</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Just released today, a new report by Robert Buckley and published by the Digital Preservation Coalition is titled, <a href="http://www.dpconline.org/docs/reports/dpctw08-01.pdf">JPEG 2000 - a Practical Digital Preservation Standard?</a> and addresses archival and preservation issues with the <a href="http://www.jpeg.org/jpeg2000/">JPEG2000</a> format.  

Aren't sure what JPEG2000 is all about?  The report also does a good job of concisely explaining the attributes and advantages of the format:

<blockquote>

A single architecture for lossless and visually lossless image compression
• A single JPEG 2000 master image can supply multiple derivative images
• Progressive display, multi-resolution imaging and scalable image quality
• The ability to handle large and high-dynamic range images
• Generous metadata support

With JPEG 2000, an application can access and decode only as much of the compressed image as needed to perform the task at hand. 

JPEG 2000 also improves a user’s ability to interact with an image. The zoom, pan, and rotate operations that users increasingly expect in networked image systems are performed dynamically by accessing and decompressing just those parts of the JPEG2000 codestream containing the compressed image data for the region of interest.

Using a single JPEG 2000 master to satisfy user requests for dynamic viewing reduces storage costs and management overhead by eliminating the need to maintain multiple derivatives in a repository.
</blockquote>

To see JPEG2000 files in action, try examining one of the maps in the <a href="http://www.library.unlv.edu/maps/index.html">Southern Nevada History in Maps</a> collection. After selecting an image of interest, click on Zoom and Pan in the record and compare what is viewable by zooming in from the default size to 100% to see the amazing detail available.]]></description>
         <link>http://blogs.library.unlv.edu/digital/2008/02/new_report_on_jpeg2000_image_f.html</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.library.unlv.edu/digital/2008/02/new_report_on_jpeg2000_image_f.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 10:55:38 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Blending, Merging, Integrating: Librarians and IT Departments</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Check out this interesting article, <a href="http://chronicle.com/free/v54/i19/19a00103.htm">Strains and Joys Color Mergers Between Libraries and Tech Units </a>about the possibilities of merging librarians and IT departments to help provide user-centric services.

<blockquote>David W. Dodd, the CIO who arrived at Xavier University in 2005, said students and faculty members wanted three basic things: "Provide the services I'm looking for, in the manner I want, and <em>get</em> out of my way." They weren't getting any of them.</blockquote>

 It doesn't look easy or comfortable, as you can see reflected in this quote from a failed merger:

<blockquote>Tensions arose when technology workers, ponytailed young men, began sharing the same office space with librarians, most of whom were older women, said Ms. Wagner. According to her account, the men brought in a huge microwave, were slobs, had messy cords dangling from equipment, and said they worked much harder than the librarians who left work at 4:30 and took breaks throughout the day.</blockquote>

While this may be a humorous quote, you can imagine some librarians being rocketed right out of their comfort zone as they experience being "blended" with IT staff. And it can be hard to imagine some IT departments ever refining their customer service skills to the standards most librarians pride themselves on. If this is the way things are headed we all need to start thinking about our current library culture and how we can integrate the best of both worlds to benefit our users.]]></description>
         <link>http://blogs.library.unlv.edu/digital/2008/02/blending_merging_integrating_l.html</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.library.unlv.edu/digital/2008/02/blending_merging_integrating_l.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 16:08:04 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>New Hybrid Publication: Library 2.0 Initiatives in Academic Libraries</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<img alt="pgraphic1-2497.jpg" src="http://blogs.library.unlv.edu/digital/pgraphic1-2497.jpg" width="120" height="160" /> About a year ago I observed a group of New Media researchers from a variety of disciplines, including the UNLV School of Journalism, who came together to research the Consumer Electronics show, trade shows, and technology through a variety of academic disciplines. These scholars, working with the <a href="http://chnm.gmu.edu/">Center for History and New Media</a> proposed an interesting methodology of "swarm" scholarship (spontaneous, "in the moment", data collection) combined with a hybrid publication of both a monograph and an evolving digital component (a wiki) to complement the content.  This was the first time I was introduced to the idea, and shortly thereafter I was asked to collaborate with some of my UNLV colleagues on a book chapter for <em>Library 2.0 Initiatives in Academic Libraries</em> using many of the same techniques.  

While writing about Library 2.0 was exciting, it was equally as intriguing to be part of a new type of dynamic scholarship that involved not only research, writing and editing, but also continuing updates and status reports on projects that, at this minute, are evolving and growing. There were times in the past year that I admit I became burned out on Web 2.0. I felt like it was everywhere and un-escapable; a trend that was going to be worn out by the time the book hit the publisher. But, the beauty of the hybrid project is that the projects detailed in the various chapters are <em>not </em>confined to the print their authors composed last year! They can be modified and reported upon as they mutate into new initiatives, are evaluated and refined, and as they transform from experiments into integrated library services. This is the most exciting thing about the Library 2.0 project. The print publication is available from <a href="http://www.alastore.ala.org/SiteSolution.taf?_sn=catalog2&_pn=product_detail&_op=2497">ALA</a> and the <a href="http://acrl.ala.org/L2Initiatives/index.php?title=Main_Page">wiki </a>will follow the projects through the next two years.

This type of hybrid research presents all sorts of interesting challenges and opportunities for libraries. How do we assist with this new type of research (topics that are a moving target or require timeliness and nimbleness, collaboration and new technological tools)?  How do we as consumers of information adapt (if we can't just wait for it to be printed, cataloged, shelved and circulated)? And how do we preserve this new type of information resource into the future (is it ever really "finished"...)?  I, for one, find these two projects compelling as they seem to give life and vitality to the somewhat stodgy and oppressive "traditional" world of publishing and provoke all sorts of interesting discussions of "Librarianship 2.0".

]]></description>
         <link>http://blogs.library.unlv.edu/digital/2008/01/new_hybrid_publication_library_2.html</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.library.unlv.edu/digital/2008/01/new_hybrid_publication_library_2.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 15:31:43 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Attention LIS Students!</title>
         <description><![CDATA[I am a member of the ALA New Members Roundtable Student Chapter of the Year Award and I am trying to get the word out about this award.  Please forward to any interested students you might know.  Thanks!  

<strong>Applicants Sought for the NMRT Student Chapter of the Year Award</strong>
 
Deadline: February 29, 2008
 
Calling All Student Chapters!
 
 Has your chapter had an outstanding year? Has membership in your chapter increased? Did your chapter develop and provide opportunities for members to participate in interesting and rewarding activities? Has your chapter received any awards? Do you have outstanding officers or members who should be recognized nationally?
 
Apply for the *New Members Round Table Student Chapter of the Year Award*! Applying for this award is a great way to highlight the time, energy and creativity that your chapter has put forward in planning activities and increasing student involvement. The Award is presented in recognition of a chapter’s outstanding contributions to the American Library Association, their library school, and the profession. A winner and runner-up will be selected for the award. The Student Chapter winner will receive $1,000.00 to help defray travel expenses to ALA Annual, and the winning chapter, along with the runner up, will each receive a certificate. Both will be recognized at the Student Reception at ALA Annual. All interested applicants must be accredited ALA Student Chapters.

Please visit the NMRT Student Chapter of the Year <a href="http://www.ala.org/ala/nmrt/comm/scotya.htm">Award website</a>   for more award information and application forms.]]></description>
         <link>http://blogs.library.unlv.edu/digital/2008/01/attention_lis_students.html</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.library.unlv.edu/digital/2008/01/attention_lis_students.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 14:31:47 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Library of Congress Images on Flickr</title>
         <description><![CDATA[One of my co-workers sent me an e-mail about this project and I think it is a really interesting experiment showing how the general public interacts with image collections in what they perceive as a non-library environment.  To start you may want to <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/library_of_congress/">visit the collection</a> and browse around.

The LOC has also posted a good <a href="http://www.loc.gov/rr/print/flickr_pilot_faq.html#why">FAQ</a> list that covers a lot of what I wanted to know when I heard about the project.

It is pretty amazing to read the extensive comments, explore the tagging going on (lots of international users!) and see how users are enthusiastically interacting with the collections.

What do you think?  Should we do this with some of our institution's lesser-described and popular collections?  Are any of your digital collections in Flickr?]]></description>
         <link>http://blogs.library.unlv.edu/digital/2008/01/library_of_congress_images_on.html</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.library.unlv.edu/digital/2008/01/library_of_congress_images_on.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">technology trends</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:50:52 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>New Digital Collection Announced: John Muir Journals and Drawings</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<img alt="muir.jpg" src="http://blogs.library.unlv.edu/digital/muir.jpg" width="597" height="598" />

Announced to the CONTENTdm-listserve this week:

<blockquote>The University of the Pacific Library is home to the papers of John Muir, who as a famed naturalist writer, founder of the Sierra Club, and forefather of the environmental movement, is a significant figure in California and American history. Digital images of all of John Muir's journals and drawings in the Library's Special Collections are now accessible <a href="http://library.pacific.edu/ha/digital/index.asp ">online</a>. The journals consist of 78 volumes and over 7,000 pages written between 1867 and 1913. The drawings consist of 371 images. The journals in particular demonstrate the usefulness of creating additional zoom levels in CONTENTdm.</blockquote>

Just another example of the power digitization has to free content for a larger audience. Enjoy!
]]></description>
         <link>http://blogs.library.unlv.edu/digital/2007/12/new_digital_collection_john_mu.html</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.library.unlv.edu/digital/2007/12/new_digital_collection_john_mu.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">digital projects</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 13:46:00 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>New Yorker Article on Digitization</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Check out this very well-written article <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2007/11/05/071105fa_fact_grafton">Future Reading: Digitization and Its
Discontents</a> from the New Yorker that raises many important points about digitization and the chances of ever achieving one universal digital library.

<blockquote>The supposed universal library, then, will be not a seamless mass of books, easily linked and studied together, but a patchwork of interfaces and databases, some open to anyone with a computer and WiFi, others closed to those without access or money. The real challenge now is how to chart the tectonic plates of information that are crashing into one another and then to learn to navigate the new landscapes they are creating.</blockquote>

]]></description>
         <link>http://blogs.library.unlv.edu/digital/2007/11/new_yorker_article_on_digitiza_1.html</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.library.unlv.edu/digital/2007/11/new_yorker_article_on_digitiza_1.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 14:30:15 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>OHA and Reflections on the Oral History Digitization Landscape</title>
         <description><![CDATA[October 24-28, I attended the <a href="http://alpha.dickinson.edu/oha/about.html">Oral History Association</a> Annual Meeting in Oakland, California.  For those like myself, who are new to the world of oral history, the association:
<blockquote>...seeks to bring together all persons interested in oral history as a way of collecting and interpreting human memories to foster knowledge and human dignity. With an international membership, the OHA serves a broad and diverse audience. Local historians, librarians and archivists, students, journalists, teachers, and academic scholars from many fields have found that the OHA provides both professional guidance and a collegial environment for sharing research.</blockquote>

I got involved with the conference through my participation on a panel with UNLV's Director of the Nevada Test Site Oral History Project, Mary Palevsky, and History department doctoral student, Leisl Carr, who I am partnering with to create a digital archive of the Nevada Test Site Oral History Project.  My paper was titled, "Managing the Transition from Large-Scale Oral History Research to Digital Archive: The Digital Librarian’s Perspective" and I talked mostly about what is involved in planning and building a digital collection from a collection of oral history research. Fortunately, my partners are very well-organized and appreciate the detailed work that goes into the process.  It was not long before we realized that researchers and librarians have similar values and that the key to building a successful collection lay in creating good metadata from their rich research.

I also attended other sessions at the conference and got a true sense of the diversity of oral history research.  What a wide range of voices, stories, and memories are being recorded by these researchers! For example I saw presentations and met researchers doing interviews with modern day mountain men, survivors of the Holocaust, local musicians, activists in local's women's movements, former POWs, and even histories from the Freedom to Read Foundation.  

On occasion, some of the researchers made mention of archiving, but in many of the sessions the focus was on the interviewing methodology and research, not the process of making the research accessible. I attended the presentation, "From Secrecy to Accessibility: Bringing the Realities of the Rocky Flats Nuclear Weapons Plant in from the Cold (War) ", which features content on nuclear history similar to our project.  Susan Becker from the <a href="http://www.bplcarnegie.org/oralhistory/">Boulder Public Library</a> (CO) did a great job with their website to create a full-text searchable archive that even has a nifty way of syncing with the interview audio/transcript time stamps. 

There was also a good session on "Successful Oral History Programs: Secrets to Success from those Who Know", which featured Susan Becker, the <a href="http://www.densho.org/">Japanese American Legacy Project</a>, <a href="http://coph.fullerton.edu/">California State University, Fullerton</a>, <a href="http://uaf-db.uaf.edu/Jukebox/PJWeb/pjhome.htm">University of Alaska, Fairbanks</a>, and <a href="http://swco.ttu.edu/Oral_History/main.htm">Texas Tech University</a>.  And I had hoped to attend the roundtable titled, "Revolutionizing the Repository: Accounts from Two Oral History Digitization Projects" with presenters from the <a href="http://digital.library.ucla.edu/cohr/about.jsp">UCLA Digital Library Program </a>and the <a href="http://www.lib.unc.edu/mss/sohp_interviewee/">University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill/Carolina Digital Library</a>.  Unfortunately, the time for this program conflicted with my presentation (unlucky me!).  I will be looking at the various web sites for oral history that I heard discussed during the conference. Obviously, this is a topic that is growing in interest within the community.  Next years conference in Pittsburgh is being called, "A  Convergence of Interests: Oral History in the Digital Age"!  Sounds like it will be right up my alley!]]></description>
         <link>http://blogs.library.unlv.edu/digital/2007/11/oha_and_reflections_on_the_ora.html</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.library.unlv.edu/digital/2007/11/oha_and_reflections_on_the_ora.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 07:32:13 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Conference Report from LITA Forum 2007</title>
         <description><![CDATA[This was the first <a href="http://www.lita.org/ala/lita/litaevents/litanationalforum2007denver/forum2007.cfm">LITA Forum</a> I have attended and overall I found the size and programming of the conference to be good. There were two preconferences, which I did not attend, but I went to a variety of sessions that deserve to be highlighted here.

DAY ONE
<strong>Opening General Session</strong>: <em>The Scientific and Social Challenges of Global Warming</em> by Jeffrey Kiehl of the National Center for Atmospheric Research
Apparently LITA has a tradition of booking a local speaker to open the conference, and despite the gloomy subject this was an interesting talk. What made it special was that Mr. Kiehl not only spoke about the science of global warming, but also about the communication of the scientific data and how the way we present information can determine whether or not it has impact. He encouraged everyone in the audience to think about their own "personal global warming" story as a means of combating the apathy, numbness, and denial, that often meet scientific news on climate change.

<em>David and Goliath Take on Social Tools</em> by Genny Engle and Michelle Boule
This talk introduced the variety of social tools available and delved a bit into their popularity and potential library applications.  I was pleased to note that UNLV is currently exploring (or has already implemented) most of these tools (IM chat, blogs, wikis, Facebook/MySpace, etc.) Maybe it is because we have already spent time on the subject, but at times it seems hard to imagine that anyone in the library world could still be oblivious to Web 2.0.

<em>Real World Metadata Management with the University of North Texas Libraries' Metadata Analysis Tool</em> by Mark Phillips
By far, one of the best sessions I attended! This talk centered around a custom tool that was created to perform maintenance, reporting functions, and other types of analysis of digital collections metadata.  The tool was really great at providing multiple views of the metadata, which Mr. Phillips noted "is the key to analyzing metadata" (for everything from clean-up of spelling/punctuation to plural agreement and authority control). For instance, the metadata can be viewed in such forms as an A-Z list, by contributing institution, as a report/graph, or as word clouds.  Queries could also be run to find null values in required metadata fields, which would definitely come in handy with the collections I administer. <a href="http://digital.library.unt.edu/">University of North Texas</a> has rapidly grown their digital collections and with the help of tools like this, their metadata is equally as rich and valuable as the digital images. Great presentation.

DAY TWO
<strong>General Session</strong>:<em>The Future is not out of Reach: Change, Library 2.0 and Emerging Trends</em> by David Lee King of Topeka and Shawnee County Public Library
Mr. King was a very dynamic and exciting speaker, but I am afraid with all the time I have already spent on the subject of Web 2.0 that the "future" kind of seemed more like the present.  Good presenter...less interesting topic.
<a href="http://litablog.org/2007/10/06/david-lee-king-keynote-podcast-lita-forum-2007/">Podcast available</a>!

<em>5 Minute Madness</em>
This was one of my favorite sessions.  Quick, interesting, and practical, 5 Minute Madness was a on-the-fly sign-up at the conference spontaneous session and each person had 5 minutes to cover their project/topic/or research.  It was particularly interesting to hear about the need for a fast institutional repository following the Virgina Tech massacre to preserve the variety of gifts, letter, and tributes received. I also was introduced to two very creative tools (one for Easy Borrow- a single interface search for ILL and BYU's service of custom RSS feeds of new books).

<strong>Lunch</strong> (BTW: LITA had really good food and dessert at lunchtime. Yum.)

<em>The Biodiversity Heritage Library Mass Digitization Project: A Grandeur in This View of Digital Libraries</em> by Martin Kalfatovic and Suzanne Chernau Pilsk
Excellent session! This was an session introducing the very large-scale, high-impact digitization  project that the Smithsonian (and others) are conducting to create a digital library of biodiversity information recorded in taxonomies and historic indexes of species names. The <a href="http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/">BHL</a> will eventually also form part of the <a href="http://www.eol.org/">Encyclopedia of Life</a>.  Basically, this is the kind of session that leaves you in awe of the sheer amount of work involved in a mass digitization project, but also leaves you feeling that there really is impact and usefulness in digitization. Fascinating.

<em>Facet Forward: Faceted Navigation of Federated Search Results for Cultural Heritage Materials</em> by Danielle Cuniff Plumer, David Dorman, and Mark Phillips
While this session focused on metadata harvesting and federated searching (which we are not currently doing) it was interesting to hear how <a href="http://www.thdi.org/">Texas Heritage Online</a> was handling the need to aggregate materials.  Mr. Dorman also presented the open source solution that Index Data provides. Something worth looking into if you are working on this type of project.

DAY THREE
<strong>Breakfast</strong>: Breakfast burritos at the continental breakfast (I am in heaven!)

<strong>Poster Sessions</strong> Well, because I was presenting my own poster session, I missed most of the others.  There was one interesting poster on SFX usability, another on <em>MySpace vs. Facebook</em> (verdict: both!) and a very good poster by my table-neighbor on <em>Converting Technophobes into Technophiles: Empowering Reluctant Library Staff </em>(one example: forbid the phrase: "I'm not "techie" enough...")  

I also missed the last concurrent session that ran during the posters, but heard really good things about the <em>User-Centered Research and Library Technology</em> by David Lindahl and Nancy Fried Foster where usability studies were done with three different groups. One interesting idea was cutting apart the pieces of a library web site and having students piece it back together where they thought things should be. Food for thought.

<strong>Closing Session</strong><em> In Our Cages With Golden Bars</em> by Jeremy Frumkin of Oregon State University
This was a very good closing session that summed up some very pertinent take-aways More can be found at <a href="http://digitallibrarian.org/">The Digital Librarian</a> (Jeremy Frumkin's blog):
<ul>
<li>we should move away from the "next generation catalog" and stop imposing library culture and terms on a service. Instead, we should look at it from a business perspective and a user perspective.</li>
<li>We need to think about the whole process from Discovery to Delivery because this is the main mission of libraries. People should be able to find in one click and have the material delivered to them in another click.</li>
<li>Mr. Frumkin also stressed the importance of a diversity of viewpoints and mentioned the <a href="http://www.code4lib.org/">Code4Lib</a> scholarships that address this need</li>
</ul>
<a href="http://litablog.org/2007/10/08/jeremy-frumkin-keynote-podcast-lita-forum-2007/">Podcast available</a>!
Handouts and presentation materials were provided on a flash drive, so if you would like more information on any of the session go to the LITA Blog or contact me for materials.







]]></description>
         <link>http://blogs.library.unlv.edu/digital/2007/10/conference_report_from_lita_fo_1.html</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.library.unlv.edu/digital/2007/10/conference_report_from_lita_fo_1.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">conferences</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 10:40:38 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Required Reading: A Librarian&apos;s 2.0 Manifesto</title>
         <description><![CDATA[ Laura Cohen's <a href="http://liblogs.albany.edu/library20/2006/11/a_librarians_20_manifesto.html">A Librarian's 2.0 Manifesto</a> should be required reading for everyone working in an academic library. Looking around my library I see that we are busy attending meetings, scheduling appointments, and trouble-shooting problems. Some of us are already over-extended with time-sensitive projects. But here are just a couple of statements from the <em>Manifesto</em>. I think you will find that they are simple and straightforward, yet profound.

<blockquote>I will recognize that the universe of information culture is changing fast and that libraries need to respond positively to these changes to provide resources and services that users need and want.</blockquote>

<blockquote>I will recognize that libraries change slowly, and will work with my colleagues to expedite our responsiveness to change.</blockquote>

<blockquote>I will be courageous about proposing new services and new ways of providing services, even though some of my colleagues will be resistant.</blockquote>

<blockquote>I will validate, through my actions, librarians' vital and relevant professional role in any type of information culture that evolves.</blockquote>


As someone that works to provide information via the web I not only need to "talk the talk", but also "walk the walk" by incorporating these concepts into both my ideas and my actions.  Try starting your next meeting or conversation with this <em>Manifesto</em> and see what happens!]]></description>
         <link>http://blogs.library.unlv.edu/digital/2007/09/required_reading_a_librarians.html</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.library.unlv.edu/digital/2007/09/required_reading_a_librarians.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 14:58:41 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Your Opinion on Technology Conferences</title>
         <description><![CDATA[I am currently gearing up for the 2007 LITA Forum and saw this announcement come across my RSS feeder this morning.  It is a <a href="http://wanderingeyre.com/2007/09/04/survey-about-technology-conferences/">survey</a> about technology conferences posted on Michelle Boule's <a href="http://">A Wandering Eyre</a> blog where she writes that she is a member of "an ALA LITA Committee that is trying to design a better technology conference". Here, here!

While ALA conferences seem to provide a smattering of "technology in libraries overviews", they often focus on trends without providing practical information. I've notice that many of my colleagues find conferences like <a href="http://www.infotoday.com/il2007/">Internet Librarian</a> to be more relevant to what they are actually doing day to day.  In my own experience, I feel that user group meetings (like the CONTENTdm Western Users Group) have been the most helpful to getting hand-on training, answers to specific questions, and insights from librarians and programmers working on specific applications, solutions, or enhancements.  If you have opinions on technology conferences, this is a opportunity to share your opinion and hopefully squeeze a bit more out of your hard-to-come by travel funding.]]></description>
         <link>http://blogs.library.unlv.edu/digital/2007/09/your_opinion_on_technology_con.html</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.library.unlv.edu/digital/2007/09/your_opinion_on_technology_con.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Announcements</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 10:54:57 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>CONTENTdm Western User Group Meeting, July 23-24, 2007</title>
         <description><![CDATA[The first ever <a href="http://www.oclc.org/western/info/contentdmug/default.htm">CONTENTdm Western Users Group Meeting</a> is scheduled for July 23-24 at Reed College in Portland, OR.  Although users of the software meet annually at ALA conferences, this two-day meeting was arranged in response to the overwhelming desire of CONTENTdm users to have more time to get together and talk about their experiences, challenges, and successes building CONTENTdm  digital collections.

The <a href="http://www.consultdm.com/wiki/index.php?title=wu2007:Sessions">agenda</a> for the meeting includes topics such as: All Things Metadata, Customizations, Multi-state/Partner Collaborations, and Publicizing Collections. I will be participating in a panel discussion on Workflow Models with Eric Luhrs of Lafayette College and Joanna Burgess of Reed College.

The event is sponsored by OCLC Western and the organizers have set up a <a href="http://www.consultdm.com/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page">Western Users Group Wiki</a> with the agenda, speaker information, and logistics for attendees.]]></description>
         <link>http://blogs.library.unlv.edu/digital/2007/07/contentdm_western_user_group_m.html</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.library.unlv.edu/digital/2007/07/contentdm_western_user_group_m.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">CONTENTdm</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">conferences</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">events</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 08:49:06 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
